killtown's secret archive: August 2008

HELLO KILLTOWN?

YOU HAVE SLANDERED G
IF BY "G"
YOU MEAN GENGHIS6199

BTW
ANONYMOUS DOES NOT CONDONE
DEATH THREATS

ANONYMOUS
ENCOURAGES LEGAL ACTIONS

THIS MAKES NO SENSE
AS DESCRIBED

???

MR THOMAS POTTER
POSTED THIS
ABOUT ELLEN MARIANI

http://mrthomaspotter.blogspot.com/2008/06/mr-thomas-potter-revels-in-mocking-911.html

A CHANGE OF HEART?
THEN "AMANDA" SHOULD
REMOVE OR UPDATE HIS BLOG

MISSING IN PROPOSAL:
STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR

SUGGESTIONS:
NO
LIBEL SLANDER PRIVACY INVASION
PHYSICAL/VERBAL ATTACKS ON PRIVATE PEOPLE

HUH?

ANONYMOUS
IS THE FIRST TO AGREE
THIS WOMAN IS AN UNPLEASANT
RIGHT WING DEMAGOGUE

BUT THAT IS NOT
AGAINST THE LAW

BY THIS BROAD STANDARD
KILLTOWN IS DEFINITELY
A "CRIMINAL"

REMEMBER THESE WORDS:

"AND IF I INSULT YOU, YOU SHOULDN'T DEBATE WITH ME ANYMORE EITHER"

ANYONE
HOUNDED BY KILLTOWN
RUDELY DEMANDING ANSWERS
COPY/PASTE
THIS QUOTE

THAT SHOULD
SHUT HIM UP

"We are a group of concerned citizens who seek justice against those who let Killtown slip through the cracks and turn into a person who harasses strangers over the internet..."

IF KILLTOWNS MEANING IS
SUPPOSEDLY "OBSESSIVE" PHOTOS HAVE BEEN DELETED
THAT WOULD BE PROOF
THERE IS NO OBSESSION

WHICH IS IT
KILLTOWN?

KILLTOWN
IS A REGULAR AT YOUR FORUM
ANONYMOUS
CANNOT APPEAR
TO PLAY FAVORITES

LEGAL OR NOT
WHEN CALLING A PRIVATE PERSON
IT IS NOT ETHICAL TO NOT INFORM THEM
YOU ARE RECORDING

THE SURPRISE AND HESITATION YOU HEAR
IS NOT GUILT
IT IS "WTF?"

NO ONE APPROVES
OF STRANGERS RECORDING THEIR CALLS

PLEASE RECONSIDER THIS TACTIC
WITH NONCRIMINAL PRIVATE PERSONS
IF YOU WANT WIN

ANONYMOUS
HAS DROPPED
MANY FAIL TACTICS

TO YOUR CREDIT
UNLIKE KILLTOWN
YOU DO NOT
HIDE THIS BEHIND YOUR PSEUDONYM

KILLTOWN
WHEN WILL YOU APOLOGIZE
TO THE MANY PEOPLE
YOU HAVE SLANDERED LIBELED DEFAMED?

YOUR REPEATED RUDENESS?
PRIVACY INVASION?
GANG STALKING?
ANONYMOUS
IS WAITING

anonymous concludes
killtown is ashamed
to have decency seen on his forum
having little decency himself

it is deplorable
killtown never mentions this responsible act
while continuing to libel
this man as an "insane stalker"